A bitter High Court dispute has broken out amongst prospective neighbours around the construction of a wall in a coastal site within a north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted nationwide notice following an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed relatives residence at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental issues, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Instances report about René Collier and also the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a neighborhood disagreement has developed into a very publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around building performs at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and an organization director respectively, seek out to make their family property. The situation has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, exactly where growth pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of recognized inhabitants. According to the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining constructed by their future neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted under setting up authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally people of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their arranging permission by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their web-site, resulting in an encroachment on a Specific Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as such locations are topic to rigid controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Of their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments could have lasting ecological repercussions, specifically in the sensitive coastal surroundings including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach of their planning permission, and say the wall, which happens to be partly created, is in the proper place. Their legal team has characterised the action as an make an effort to delay or frustrate a lawful development. The few accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding in an effort to preserve their check out, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of numerous coastal setting up disputes, in which sights of the sea are both of those highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary attempts from the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the location, according to sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-significant drinking water during a storm to photograph the website Irish Situations, a picture which has considering that turn into emblematic from the intensity on the dispute. These steps weren't merely symbolic; they have been meant to gather Visible proof of your wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Occasions documented, describing how the two Males entered the h2o in the course of critical climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm water to photograph the internet site turned Among the most putting descriptions to emerge from court reporting. The Irish Times posting about accountant Paul Feely observed that this sort of actions were cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ perception the wall prolonged into a region affected by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was remaining encroached upon.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been covered in detail because of the countrywide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 turned extensively searched phrases as viewers sought to comprehend the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read more submissions on no matter if interim orders must be granted to halt construction pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial second during the lawful timeline.
At the Main of your dispute is usually a disagreement more than boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain that the wall, as constructed, goes past what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has actually been described as meticulous in his assessment of preparing documents, maps, and conditions hooked up for the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two pressured that their motion is determined by problem for environmental protection and adherence to arranging law. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private watch, insisting as an alternative that it is about making sure that progress at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've got described their very long-standing relationship to the region as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a few merely trying to establish a relatives property in accordance With all the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches over a Unique Place of Conservation and say that all works have been completed determined by Qualified advice and authorized ideas. Their attorneys have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include entering The ocean for the duration of a storm, never change the underlying info.
The situation has also raised broader questions about how arranging disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute over construction of wall at coastal website has grown to be a shorthand description for the condition that many observers see as increasingly common. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation among personal land, community foreshore, and guarded habitats has become extra contentious.
The Irish Situations article about René Collier mentioned which the businessman Rene Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times had previously been associated with regional advocacy on scheduling and environmental issues, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from extremely distinct Skilled backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, became synonymous With all the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from your sea Irish Moments protection emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of midsection-high drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods and René Collier waded via midsection-large drinking water during a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting the two the Bodily fact of your coastline as well as the symbolic character with the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see as an extreme solution.
Since the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be unsure. The court need to determine whether or not the wall as created complies with scheduling authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Distinctive Location of Conservation has occurred. The legal arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and planning problems. Still the human factor remains central: neighbours who should live together with each other long following the lawful expenses are actually compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of development will work at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the case extend outside of that address. For planners, developers, and citizens alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. Additionally, it underscores how immediately a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when elementary troubles which include environmental protection and residence rights are perceived to be at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand stays a location of pure magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre of the dispute stands partly constructed, a physical manifestation of unresolved lawful issues. No matter if it'll eventually be altered, removed, or concluded as planned will rely on the court’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probably go on to look in headlines, linked indelibly to The most carefully viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin in recent times.